Show simple item record

dc.creatorTatalović, Vladan
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-19T13:05:08Z
dc.date.available2024-02-19T13:05:08Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn0006-5722
dc.identifier.urihttps://rpbf.bfspc.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/211
dc.description.abstractBy noting the absence of the interaction between historical and literary analysis in the exegesis of the Johannine Son of Man, this study proposes prioritizing synchronic approach. When the methodological weaknesses of the historical-critical analysis in reaching a consistent explanation of the Johannine Son of Man is highlighted, its tendency to seek a common denominator within the complex Son of Man debate is noted. Along those lines, it is suggested that the Gospel narrative should take over that role. After considering the hermeneutical implications of such a move, the example of verse 1,51 is presented as a case study.en
dc.publisherUniverza v Ljubljani
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceBogoslovni Vestnik-Theological Quarterly-Ephemerides Theologicae
dc.subjectsynchronic approachen
dc.subjectSon of Manen
dc.subjectnarrativeen
dc.subjectFourth Gospelen
dc.titlePrioritizing the Synchronic Approach to the Johannine Son of Man: John 1,51 as a Case Studyen
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.licenseBY
dc.citation.epage103
dc.citation.issue1
dc.citation.other79(1): 93-103
dc.citation.rankM220
dc.citation.spage93
dc.citation.volume79
dc.identifier.doi10.34291/BV2019/01/Tatalovic
dc.identifier.fulltexthttps://rpbf.bfspc.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/740/Tatalovic_Prioritizing_the_Synchronic.pdf
dc.identifier.rcubconv_312
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85075361748
dc.identifier.wos000483982700008
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record