Upotreba i razvoj pojma προαιρεσις od Aristotela do sv. Maksima Ispovednika
The Usage and the Development of the Term Prohairesis from Aristotle to Maximus the Confessor
dc.creator | Đakovac, Aleksandar | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-02-19T12:59:54Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-02-19T12:59:54Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0351-2274 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://rpbf.bfspc.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/149 | |
dc.description.abstract | Pojam prohairesis ima bogatu istoriju razvoja, i njegova upotreba je od ključnog značaja za razvoj i razumevanje temeljnih etičkih i antropoloških pretpostavki drevne helenske filozofije. U ovom članku analiziramo najvažnije momente semantičke transformacije ovog pojma, sa posebnim osvrtom na implikacije koje je njegova upotreba imala u vizantijskom teološkom i filozofskom nasleđu, koje je svoj vrhunski izraz pronašlo u delu Maksima Ispovednika i njegovoj hristološkoj sintezi. Izjednačavanje pojmova prohairesis i gnome sa jedne strane, i njihovo razdvajanje od autentične ljudske prirode, kao i upotreba pojma thelesis u značenju originalne „ljudske volje“, predstavljaju temeljnu reviziju antičkog filozofskog nasleđa koje se može uporediti sa uvođenjem distinkcije između pojmova ousia i hipostasis od strane Kapadokijskih otaca. Analiza sporovedena u ovom članku ima za cilj da pokaže u kojoj meri i na koji način je vizantijska teološka i filozofska misao usvojila ali i suštinski redefinisala sopstveno helensko zaleđe. | |
dc.description.abstract | The term prohairesis has a long history; its usage is crucial for the development and understanding of basic ethical and anthropological assumptions in ancient Hellenic philosophy. In this article the author analyses the most important moments for the semantic transformation of this term, with particular reference to the implications of its usage in Byzantine theological and philosophical heritage, with the ultimate expression in work of St Maximus the Confessor and his christological synthesis. The equation between the terms prohairesis and gnome and their separation from the authentic human nature, as well as the usage of the term thelesis for the original „human will“, represents the thorough revision of the antique philosophical heritage which could be compared with the distinction of the terms ousia and hypostasis by Cappadocian Fathers. In this article the author will show the extent to which and the way in which Byzantine theological and philosophical thought adopted and transformed its own Hellenic heritage. | |
dc.publisher | Srpsko filozofsko društvo, Beograd | |
dc.rights | openAccess | |
dc.source | Theoria, Beograd | |
dc.subject | Aristotel | |
dc.subject | Maksim Ispovednik | |
dc.subject | prohairesis | |
dc.subject | gnome | |
dc.subject | thelesis | |
dc.subject | volja | |
dc.subject | hristologija | |
dc.subject | Aristotle | |
dc.subject | Maximus the Confessor | |
dc.subject | will | |
dc.subject | Christology | |
dc.title | Upotreba i razvoj pojma προαιρεσις od Aristotela do sv. Maksima Ispovednika | sr |
dc.title | The Usage and the Development of the Term Prohairesis from Aristotle to Maximus the Confessor | en |
dc.type | article | |
dc.rights.license | ARR | |
dc.citation.epage | 86 | |
dc.citation.issue | 3 | |
dc.citation.other | 58(3): 69-86 | |
dc.citation.rank | M24 | |
dc.citation.spage | 69 | |
dc.citation.volume | 58 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.2298/theo1503071d | |
dc.identifier.fulltext | https://rpbf.bfspc.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/32/146.pdf | |
dc.identifier.rcub | conv_5107 | |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion |